The Plow/Probe
(also known as the Probe Plus.)
This was the first fucking machine I bought. I was delighted.
I’d made a fuckzall previously, and the women I’d tried it with had responded… well, better than I could have hoped. There were loud, extreme, extravagant orgasms, knocking furniture over in other states.
So it was only a matter of time before I upgraded. I chose to buy the eXtreme Plow, a dark and gleaming thing from Orgasm Alley.
I didn’t know that the technology was just minutes away from being out of date.
The eXtreme Plow/Probe Plus is a smooth ride, that’s for sure. It’s got a motor that turns a wheel; the wheel is attached to a slider from a cabinet. It moves in and out, in and out, with a steady stroke that’s nice to see.
I’ve been told it’s nice to feel, too.
Innnnn and ouuuut, innnnn and ouuuut. You can adjust the speed with a dial, which is nice. Simple.
The stroke length can be adjusted from one inch to five inches. To make the stroke shorter or longer, you need to turn the machine off, manually unscrew a thingy, reposition it, and screw it back in.
Say what?
Yes, it’s true. If a woman is using the eXtreme Plow and decides it’d feel better if it was going a little deeper, she’ll need to turn it off, unscrew something, manually reposition it, and screw it back in.
I knew this before I bought it. I bought it anyway. Why? Because every single fuckmachine for sale was like that.
At that time, anyway.
The eXtreme Plow was a solid, dependable device. Month after month, it gave my partners a lot of pleasure and a lot of fun. It freed my hands up for vibrators or just touching.
I decided the shiny black metal was too intimidating, so I decorated the eXtreme Plow with Hello Kitty stickers.
The eXtreme Plow, an Eroscillator, an electrified dildo, an ErosTek 312.
I was happy with the eXtreme Plow until I found out about the existence of the HugHer. The HugHer did so much more than the simple back and forth. It could build elaborate, compelling rhythms inside a woman’s body. It could tease and withhold, it could inch its way in or it could fuck hard and pounding. There were so many different motions, and they had been designed to be so erotic.
The HugHer is part of a new generation of fucking machines. The eXtreme Plow and the fuckzall are reciprocating – that is, they move back and forth at the same speed, to the same depth. The new generation is motion-controlled — they can go in, then slow down, continue going in, and pull out quickly, or any other combination.
In short — the eXtreme Plow is an impressive little machine, but why spend $750 on something so limited when you can get something extraordinary for $250 more?
Next-gen fucking machines include the HugHer, the ShockSpot, and the Glide. Out of those three, the least expensive is also the best. How awesome is that?
This looks like a great machine. I wish it cost less than $1,000. Does it use a lot of electricity?
Sexorcism, I don’t actually know its wattage, but it’s never caused my circuit-breakers to go on the fritz — and they’re temperamental buggers. I also would like to see prices come down, but the HugHer is in the price range of many inferior sex machines, such as the Caesar, the Sybian, the ShockSpot, the Black Magic from Orgasm Alley. It has two PIC microcontrollers controlling its motor, and motion control is not easy technology to work with. I know — I tried.
Well, I would like to respond to these comments. I am the designer of the Shockspot and your post is flat out wrong in what you state. First of all, the shockspot has a six inch standard stroke (8 inch standard by the end of June) with longer strokes available upon request. The Shockspot can move discretely! It can go set increments, stop, and move additional increments! It can be set to move to various depths while maintaining a set stroke, acceleration and speed! We also have bluetooth and are ready to release our Smartphone software. We would appreciate it if you would post accurate information about our product. We have NEVER mislead our customers. I would like to see an example of where you think this has occurred. I understand you are promoting another product but please be courteous enough to post accurate information about the Shockspot. Where have we spammed? Never have we spammed anyone! I’ll gladly put the Shockspot’s programs up against any other machine on the market. Oh, by the way, the stand alone version is making it’s appearance very shortly. Please contact me if you care to discuss further. Shockspot.net
By the way, I would also like an example of how we are making a dishonest buck? It’s sad that this sort of comment is made without any foundation. The Shockspot performance specs are perfectly accurate and are not misleading in any way. Let’s see how long these two posts last on this site…..
Mark,
I would like to see a couple of video where girls actually use your machine in actual real world conditions besides the YouTube demo video. I am sure you can hook up with a movie company to provide this type of demo
Mark and I communicated privately, and we determined that I was reviewing one of his older models. The old models had a four-inch maximum stroke; the current models have a six-inch maximum stroke; the next generation will have an eight-inch maximum stroke.
This leads to new questions, though. How are you planning to distinguish between the generations? I mean, suppose next year someone decides to sell a ShockSpot on eBay. A buyer goes to your website and reads that the ShockSpot comes with a maximum stroke of eight inches. They bid on the eBay auction and win! — only to find that the machine they bought has a teeny four-inch maximum stroke.
I think the ShockSpot website needs to take some steps to avoid customer confusion. Leaving out this kind of information — model distinctions — means that the ShockSpot has questionable resale value.
Mark claims that his software updates allow the ShockSpot to function in ways that the earlier models couldn’t. I haven’t had a chance to study the software updates yet, so I can neither confirm nor deny his statements.
Mark, you and I have discussed my accusations of spamming privately, but there’s more that can be said.
I pointed out this stellar comment that “Heidi” left on TimeOutNewYork:
“www.shockspot.net You’ll fall in love.. not awkward, fully automatic, VOICE ACTIVATED!, control with your computer, bluetooth handset, voice, or remote. Let me know if you have any questions.”
TimeOutNewYork has a regular feature, where people tell an anecdote, give a slice of life. The title of the feature is, “I want to…”
Suppose that sentence had ended with, “become a vegetarian.”
Then there would be a few paragraphs’ description of the author’s experience trying out vegetarianism. Let’s say the author decided, at the end, that he just liked steak and sushi too much to become a vegetarian.
Imagine someone posting a comment that said, “Veggie Palace on 4th and Whitney has the BEST vegetarian food!” It would be something of a non-sequitur, wouldn’t it? It would mean that the commenter hadn’t actually read the post. The commenter just read the title.
“Heidi” just read the title. “Heidi” posted a comment advertising for your device on an article that had seen no activity for five months. “Heidi” is not a reader of TimeOutNewYork. “Heidi” didn’t read the article. “Heidi” was just spamming.
You say you weren’t behind Heidi, and I’m taking you at your word. But some associate of yours WAS behind Heidi, and you should make sure your friends and allies know to identify themselves and let people know that there might be a bias in effect.
You probably noticed that someone else plugged for the HugHer. But that person identified himself; Master J is a real person, a well-respected figure in the BDSM scene.
And that’s a MAJOR difference. Lona’s review on extremerestraints was cringe-inducing. I suspect you were embarrassed by the ludicrous fantasy, the lesbo banging her stepmom with a fucking machine. The others were not cringe-inducing, but they’re also suspicious. Who the heck ARE these people?
It’s not just Heidi, and it’s not just Lona. MrNMrsTristate, Tony G., Franco and Andrea, Keith and Susan, J.R Ryder (unless you mean the pro wrestler or the Christian author), Karren and Danny, Christie San Diego, J. Kr., and so on. Who ARE these people??? I googled all of them, for naught.
Not one of them has any significant web presence, or any presence at real-life events. You have no testimonials or reviews from anyone who speaks at sex education events, or anyone who presents at bdsm clubs, or anyone who performs at adult parties, or anyone who travels the swinger party circuit, or anyone who keeps a sex toy blog, or anyone who runs porn (except for TomCat, and TomCat was not impressed), or even anyone who has ever written a review of even the teeniest vibrator. These testimonials, all of them, are from “people” who seem to have come into existence just long enough review your product and then vanish into the aether.
I run a large and active fucking machine group on the internet. Many of the leaders in the field are in my group. My question to you is, how come you have all these questionable “testimonials” from “people” who may or may not exist, and 1,300 people who are really, really into fucking machines have never seen a ShockSpot?
Oh, and just to revisit the question of MY motives: if someone were to buy a HugHer through my blog, I’d get nothing. If someone were to buy a ShockSpot from extremerestraints through my blog, I’d get $315. Why would I be biased against the ShockSpot?
Your information is inaccurate, please visit our sight and update your blog.
By the way, what motions can the Hugher produce that the shockspot can not?
Also, JR Ryder…. is the pro wrestler and you can contact him…. I’ll provide email addresses…
If you like, contact me privately and I can provide emails for those individuals providing emails with their testimonials.
So, what is it that you didn’t like about the Shockspot? Was it the 12 inch stroke, or the stand alone remote (no pc required) I just don’t understand why you are choosing to attack a product that you have never tried.
Regarding your question about bias… I don’t know why you don’t like the Shockspot. It seems as though you have made a decision about our product based on a single post by “HEIDI”. Just how many posts like that have you found? I found the one you mentioned, that’s it, but it was not my company that posted it. This seems unfair, but it’s your blog and you can state your opinion. All I ask is that you post accurate information about our products and give a fair opinion, good or bad, based on your testing and customer feedback. We have been selling 12 inch models for over six months, which produces the equivalent of 105 in-lbs of torque on a rotary based machine. Of course our products change over a period of time. We listen to our customers and enhance our products to make our customers happy, what company doesn’t do this?
I do appreciate you posting my responses, I have to admit that I wasn’t expecting this based on our first round of discussions.
Regards,
Mark
Hey we sell a form of extrusion like 80/20 here at my work. I always imagined makeing something from it, but I never knew where to start. Again new to this stuff. Are there guides or something that I can get? Anyway, we always say here if you can imagine it, you can build it with our stuff. I would LOVE to take a few 8′ sticks home and see what I could come up with…Thanks, Matt